Court blocks land gift for Indiana religious school

Posted on by

Image of scales of justiceIn the case Wirtz v. City of South Bend, a US District court judge ruled that the city of South Bend Indiana couldn’t give away city owned land to a catholic high school. It considered the give away a violation of the first amendment.

U.S. District Judge Robert L. Miller Jr. agreed with Americans United and the ACLU that the planned land gift would violate the separation of church and state.

Said the Rev. Barry W. Lynn, Americans United executive director, “South Bend officials made a serious constitutional misstep when they voted to use taxpayer money to support a religious school. I’m glad the court put a stop to this ill-considered scheme.”

The three civil liberties groups filed suit after the South Bend Common Council voted 5-4 to spend $1.2 million to buy property that was to be transferred to the Catholic Diocese of Ft. Wayne-South Bend for free. The land would have been used by St. Joseph’s High School to build a football stadium.

Americans United, ACLU Applaud Court Ruling Striking Down Indiana City’s Proposed Aid To Religious School

The court ruled that the land give away was a violation because:

The proposed Family Dollar transaction has the appearance of putting adherents and nonadherents on different footing, which would lead an objective, well-informed, reasonable observer to think the City is endorsing St. Joseph’s High School, the local Catholic community, or the Diocese that operates the high school. City treasury funds are, by their nature, limited, and a significant expenditure in favor of one project denies those funds to other projects, or, at least, amounts to a decision not to retain those funds in the City treasury. To the adherents, namely the supporters of St. Joseph’s High School and the Diocese, this below-market transfer of real estate could be considered an endorsement of their undertaking to rebuild and expand the high school. A well-informed and reasonable nonadherent would see the below-market transfer as a direct endorsement of a particular religion.

Wirtz v. City of South Bend 09/07/2011 pps 33-34

Direct funding going to a religious group is always a violation.


Comments for this post are closed. If you still wish to send a note to the editor, visit our contact form

  • sbj1964

    It never ceases to amaze me how Christians in this country think they are above the law,and the constitution of the United States of America. Great outcome for all Americans Thanks for the update Doug.

    • http://www.secularleft.us cadfile

      Thanks for the comment. I hadn't seen your comments for a few weeks so I hope everything is okay

  • sbj1964

    Been Busy, working a new project, But all is well.